Legacyleap Logo
Silverlight to Blazor Migration with Gen AI

TL;DR

  • Silverlight reached end-of-life in 2021, with RIA and XAML apps stranded on unsupported technology.

  • Blazor provides a modern, supported, and cloud-ready replacement for legacy Silverlight applications.

  • Legacyleap Gen AI de-risks Silverlight migrations with XAML translation, RIA service mapping, and parity testing.

Table of Contents

Introduction: Why Silverlight Migration Can’t Wait

Silverlight has been end-of-life since October 12, 2021. It only runs in Internet Explorer 11, itself deprecated and removed from Windows 11. For enterprises, this means Silverlight applications are now stranded on an unsupported runtime with no security patches, no vendor backing, and no talent pipeline.

The risks are clear:

  • Compliance exposure: Unsupported runtimes fail audit and regulatory checks.
  • Operational fragility: IE11 is no longer available on modern platforms, breaking access for end users.
  • Talent scarcity: Silverlight expertise has disappeared, driving up maintenance costs.

At the same time, leadership teams often ask: Is Blazor another short-lived bet like Silverlight? The answer is no. 

Unlike Silverlight, Blazor is part of Microsoft’s core .NET strategy with a published LTS roadmap: .NET 8 (LTS) through 2026, .NET 9 (STS), and .NET 10 (LTS) through 2029. Blazor is not a side-technology but the forward path for enterprise .NET apps.

This blog explores why Blazor is the right destination, the pitfalls that make Silverlight migration complex, and how Gen AI with Legacyleap turns it into a safer, faster, and verifiable program.

Why Blazor Is the Right End-State for Silverlight Migration

Blazor delivers a future-proof platform that’s fully supported, rich in enterprise tooling, and flexible across modern deployment scenarios.

DimensionSilverlight (Legacy)Blazor (.NET 8+)
Support statusEnd-of-life (2021)Backed by .NET LTS roadmap
Runtime dependencyIE11 plugin (deprecated)Runs in any modern browser (WebAssembly, Server, Hybrid)
SecurityUnsupported, high compliance riskSupported until 2026+ with ongoing patches
Talent availabilityScarce, legacy-onlyLarge, growing .NET/C# ecosystem
UI ecosystemDeprecated vendor suitesFull vendor support (Telerik, Syncfusion, DevExpress)

Key enterprise payoffs:

  • Compliance confidence → align with a supported, patched platform that passes audits.
  • Future-ready UI → component-based development with rich vendor support and Microsoft roadmap alignment.
  • Cloud and DevOps alignment → deploy Blazor apps on containers, Kubernetes, and CI/CD pipelines.
  • Unified talent pool → leverage full-stack C# developers instead of maintaining a niche skillset.

For CIOs and CTOs, Blazor is the clear successor: supported, secure, cloud-ready, and backed by a developer ecosystem large enough to sustain enterprise applications long-term.

Why Silverlight Migration Is Complex Without the Right Tools

Blazor is the Microsoft-backed successor, but the journey from Silverlight is filled with pitfalls that derail projects if handled manually:

  • No direct migration path
    • Silverlight UIs can’t be auto-converted. Every screen and workflow requires re-implementation.
    • Enterprise risk: Long delays, high engineering cost, and loss of business logic fidelity.
  • RIA Services dependency
    • Many Silverlight apps depend on WCF RIA Services, which has no modern equivalent. These must be re-architected as RESTful APIs or gRPC endpoints.
    • Enterprise risk: Brittle rewrites that risk data integrity and client-service communication.
  • UI parity gaps
    • Controls like DataGrid and PropertyGrid have no one-to-one Blazor equivalent. Replacement requires vendor-backed suites (Telerik, Syncfusion, DevExpress).
    • Enterprise risk: Inconsistent UX, increased license cost, and extended QA cycles.
  • Auth and out-of-browser features
    • Silverlight’s elevated trust and OOB functionality (isolated storage, device access) don’t translate to Blazor. Teams must adopt standards (OIDC/JWT) or shift to .NET MAUI.
    • Enterprise risk: Security exposure and disrupted user workflows if re-architected incorrectly.
  • Performance trade-offs
    • Blazor WebAssembly vs Blazor Server vs Blazor Hybrid each carry unique trade-offs in latency, payload size, and deployment complexity.
    • Enterprise risk: Poor architectural decisions leading to cost overruns or user experience degradation.

Traditional rewrites handle these blockers manually, but they are slow, brittle, and inconsistent. Enterprises need an approach that delivers predictable outcomes with parity guarantees.

How Gen AI Makes Silverlight to Blazor Migration Safer

Enterprises exploring Silverlight migration usually find themselves with two unsatisfactory options:

  • Manual rewrites: Brittle, slow, and costly. Every control, service, and business rule must be re-engineered by hand, with no guarantee of functional parity.
  • Stopgaps like OpenSilver or Uno: Short-term bridges that preserve XAML but often result in dead ends, leaving organizations locked into frameworks with limited ecosystems and uncertain longevity.

Modernization needs a different playbook. This is where Gen AI with compiler-grade guardrails fundamentally changes what’s possible:

  • Comprehension-first automation: Before any code is transformed, the platform ingests the Silverlight estate and auto-generates comprehensive documentation, including business logic in plain English, technical summaries, dependency graphs, and Swagger specs.
  • Compiler-constrained transformation: Gen AI agents operate within Abstract Syntax Trees (ASTs) and MLIR-based intermediate representations, ensuring that generated code isn’t freeform “best guess” output, but structurally correct and production-grade.
  • Functional parity validation: Automated test suites (unit, integration, and regression) are generated against the legacy Silverlight app. These become a safety net, verifying that the modernized Blazor system behaves identically before production rollout.
  • Enterprise readiness by design: The platform runs securely within client environments, with options for on-prem deployment and full control over LLMs. It supports SOC 2 and HIPAA-aligned configurations, ensuring zero data leakage or vendor lock-in.

This isn’t brute-force rewriting or experimental AI code generation. It’s a purpose-built modernization engine that combines GenAI with compiler rigor, delivering automation, validation, and enterprise control at a scale that manual methods or stopgap frameworks can’t match.

Legacyleap Delivers Predictable Outcomes at Scale

What stalls most Silverlight migrations isn’t Blazor itself — it’s the complexity of undocumented XAML, RIA Services, and vendor control gaps. Legacyleap addresses these with a platformized approach that delivers predictability and parity at scale.

How the platform supports Silverlight modernization:

  • Full XAML comprehension:
    • Silverlight UIs are parsed into ASTs and MLIR, mapped into dependency graphs that capture controls, bindings, and event flows.
    • Outcome: Leaders get a complete inventory of screens, workflows, and hidden logic before rewriting begins.
  • RIA Services re-architecture:
    • Legacy WCF RIA dependencies auto-flagged and restructured into REST or gRPC APIs, backed by EF Core for persistence.
    • Outcome: Secure, scalable service layer replaces unsupported RIA Services.
  • Vendor control mapping:
    • Deprecated Silverlight controls (DataGrid, PropertyGrid, charts) mapped to modern Blazor equivalents from Telerik, Syncfusion, or DevExpress.
    • Outcome: Parity in UX without months of trial-and-error control replacement.
  • Parity-first validation:
    • Golden workflows from Silverlight captured and replayed against Blazor implementations. Regression tests are auto-generated and wired into CI/CD pipelines.
    • Outcome: 100% functional parity validated before cutover.
  • Enterprise compliance and security:
    • Elevated trust and OOB features refactored to modern standards (OIDC/JWT, .NET MAUI for hybrid needs). All modernization steps run fully on-prem or in client cloud environments.
    • Outcome: Audit-ready migration with zero external data exposure.
  • Deployment-ready outputs:
    • Helm charts, Dockerfiles, and Terraform scripts generated out of the box.
    • Outcome: Modernized Blazor apps roll directly into containerized or cloud-native environments.

Enterprise outcomes:

  • Timelines compressed from 6–12 months to 2–4 months.
  • Reduced reliance on scarce Silverlight expertise.
  • Predictable scope and functional assurance, backed by parity tests.
  • Compliance confidence and future-ready architecture.

Plan Your Silverlight to Blazor Migration with Confidence

Silverlight is long past end-of-life. It’s unsupported, tied to a deprecated browser, and increasingly unstaffable. Every quarter spent maintaining it increases compliance risk, user disruption, and cost.

Blazor is the Microsoft-backed successor: cloud-ready, LTS-supported, with a thriving vendor and talent ecosystem. But execution is the challenge, as manual rewrites are brittle, and stopgap frameworks risk locking you into another dead end.

Legacyleap offers a different path. With compiler-grade comprehension, RIA-to-REST mapping, vendor control alignment, and CI/CD parity validation, Silverlight migration becomes a structured, verifiable modernization program that’s faster, safer, and enterprise-ready.

Start with a $0 Silverlight migration assessment. In just days, you’ll receive:

  • A Silverlight dependency map
  • RIA/COM risk scan
  • Modernization feasibility report
  • Functional documentation

A no-cost, low-risk entry point that gives leadership clarity on scope, risk, and modernization strategy.

FAQs

Q1. What happens if we delay migrating from Silverlight further?

Delaying Silverlight migration compounds technical debt. Since Silverlight is unsupported and IE11 is deprecated, continued reliance increases security vulnerabilities, compliance risk, and the cost of future recovery.

Q2. Can existing Silverlight business logic be reused in Blazor?

Yes. Legacyleap separates business logic from presentation code and maps reusable components to Blazor, preserving functional integrity and reducing rework during migration.

Q3. Is Blazor suitable for large, enterprise-grade Silverlight applications?

Blazor is designed for modern enterprise needs with support for component-based UI, WebAssembly and Server hosting, and .NET LTS alignment. It scales well for complex applications when implemented with the right architecture and tooling.

Q4. What are the security and compliance benefits of migrating to Blazor?

Blazor runs on ASP.NET Core, inheriting its modern authentication, role-based access, and secure deployment practices. Migrating removes unsupported dependencies, enabling alignment with internal compliance and external audit standards.

Q5. How long does a typical Silverlight to Blazor migration take?

With Legacyleap’s Gen AI-assisted migration, timelines are typically reduced to 2–4 months for most enterprise applications (compared to 6–12 months using manual methods) while maintaining UI accuracy and backend stability.

Share the Blog

Latest Blogs

Java Monolith to Microservices Migration with Gen AI

Java Monolith to Modular Microservices: Step-by-Step Guide

COM+ to .NET API Migration with Gen AI

Migrate COM+ to .NET APIs Faster, Safer with Gen AI Guardrails

WebLogic/JBoss to SpringBoot Migration with Gen AI

Migrate WebLogic & JBoss to Spring Boot or Containers

ADO.NET to EFCore Migration with Gen AI

Future-Proof Data: ADO.NET to EF Core 2x Faster with Gen AI

JAX-WS to REST Migration with Gen AI

JAX-WS to REST: How to Modernize SOAP-Based Java Services

VB.NET to C# Migration with Gen AI

Safe & Verified VB.NET to C# Migration with Gen AI

Technical Demo

Book a Technical Demo

Explore how Legacyleap’s Gen AI agents analyze, refactor, and modernize your legacy applications, at unparalleled velocity.

Watch how Legacyleap’s Gen AI agents modernize legacy apps ~50-70% faster

Want an Application Modernization Cost Estimate?

Get a detailed and personalized cost estimate based on your unique application portfolio and business goals.